Dear Carol,
i dont have a strong background in maths. So i made sure that i go through volume 1 slowly in order to grasp the tools that are going to be so essential in the understanding of later volumes. So far I have reached numerical methods and dont have that long a distance before finishing the chapter. I look forward to the chapter on portfolio theory and dont anticipate major wrestling with maths there. But in the numerical methods, on page 214, i dont quite follow the second half of the page. I understand the big picture, which is to prove that the particular set of parameters of binomial lattice satisfy a couple of particular conditions. But i dont follow the steps. I wonder if you could shed some light or provide some assistance? Many thanks, professor Carol! I look forward to your reply!
Dan
discretization of binomial lattice
Forum rules
DISCLAIMER: We do not warrant or represent that this forum or its content is free of viruses, worms or other code that might be contaminating or destructive. We cannot guarantee that documents or files downloaded from the Site will be free from viruses and we do not accept any responsibility for any damage or loss caused by any virus. Accordingly, for your own protection, you must use viruschecking software when using the forum. You must not post or provide to us via the forum, any document or file which you believe may contain a virus. You must virus check any document or file which you intend to post or provide to us via the forum. You must ensure that any document or file you intend to post to the forum does not contravene any applicable laws or contravene any person's legal rights. We do not accept any responsibility for any damage or loss you may suffer.
DISCLAIMER: We do not warrant or represent that this forum or its content is free of viruses, worms or other code that might be contaminating or destructive. We cannot guarantee that documents or files downloaded from the Site will be free from viruses and we do not accept any responsibility for any damage or loss caused by any virus. Accordingly, for your own protection, you must use viruschecking software when using the forum. You must not post or provide to us via the forum, any document or file which you believe may contain a virus. You must virus check any document or file which you intend to post or provide to us via the forum. You must ensure that any document or file you intend to post to the forum does not contravene any applicable laws or contravene any person's legal rights. We do not accept any responsibility for any damage or loss you may suffer.

 Posts: 815
 Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:30 pm
Re: discretization of binomial lattice
Glad to help Dan, if I can. I took a look at the page and the proof is complete, in that I state exactly what I am doing at every step, so I am not sure exactly what extra help I can give. perhaps you could point out to me excatly where you get lost  eg do you follow the first step, the 2nd order Taylor approximation? If so, do you follow the expression of (I.5.39) in the JR param case? etc. Lets see where you get lost first and then try to help, Carol
Re: discretization of binomial lattice
Hi, thanks Carol!
What i dont follow is how we get the two equations by plugging the taylor approximation into conditions I.5.39 and I.5.40? Also I dont understand why it says at the bottom of the page that I.5.42 is the solution to I.5.43 and I.5.44, becauase after all, isnt the proof about proving that I.5.42 satisfy the conditions of I.5.39 and I.5.40, so i'm a little confused.
Much appreciation, Dan
What i dont follow is how we get the two equations by plugging the taylor approximation into conditions I.5.39 and I.5.40? Also I dont understand why it says at the bottom of the page that I.5.42 is the solution to I.5.43 and I.5.44, becauase after all, isnt the proof about proving that I.5.42 satisfy the conditions of I.5.39 and I.5.40, so i'm a little confused.
Much appreciation, Dan
Re: discretization of binomial lattice
Hi Carol, I am still looking forward to hearing from you. Thank you very much! Dan.

 Posts: 815
 Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:30 pm
Re: discretization of binomial lattice
Hi Dan, not sure why but I didn't get the notification of your last post  have seen it now and will reply on Friday (today and tom. very busy) Carol

 Posts: 815
 Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:30 pm
Re: discretization of binomial lattice
Ok Dan
The steps are outlined in text  so not sure about the problem  but can you follow this?
Step 1: Since u = exp(m+delta) and d = exp(mdelta) and p = 0.5 we have
pu + (1p)d = exp(m) (1 + delta^2/2)
Step 2: Put this as r.h.s of (I.5.39) then take logs and use approx. ln(1+x) = x for small x (here x = delat^2/2)…this gives (I.5.43)
....can you see your way through other steps now?
The steps are outlined in text  so not sure about the problem  but can you follow this?
Step 1: Since u = exp(m+delta) and d = exp(mdelta) and p = 0.5 we have
pu + (1p)d = exp(m) (1 + delta^2/2)
Step 2: Put this as r.h.s of (I.5.39) then take logs and use approx. ln(1+x) = x for small x (here x = delat^2/2)…this gives (I.5.43)
....can you see your way through other steps now?
Re: discretization of binomial lattice
Hi Professor Carol, thank you so much for the enlightenment! I worked it out now. Cheers, Dan
Re: discretization of binomial lattice
Hi Carol,
Thanks so much for the material on Volatility.
Could you please check the very last line on page 214 of vol. 1? I think it should read "I.5.42 is the solution to I.5.39 and I.5.40."
Cheers,
Dan
Thanks so much for the material on Volatility.
Could you please check the very last line on page 214 of vol. 1? I think it should read "I.5.42 is the solution to I.5.39 and I.5.40."
Cheers,
Dan

 Posts: 815
 Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:30 pm
Re: discretization of binomial lattice
Hi Dan
Thanks for spotting this, but the last line on page 214 is fine as it is. I.5.43 is an expression equivalent to I.5.39 and I.5.44 is equivalent to I.5.40.
Happy new year! Carol
Thanks for spotting this, but the last line on page 214 is fine as it is. I.5.43 is an expression equivalent to I.5.39 and I.5.44 is equivalent to I.5.40.
Happy new year! Carol
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests